Cancer drug shortage may force US doctors to ration chemotherapy Predatory Journals Are Infiltrating Citation Databases . Potential Predatory and Legitimate Biomedical Journals: Can You Tell the Difference? A Cross-Sectional Comparison . Predatory Open Access: A Longitudinal Study of Article Volumes and Market Charateristics . Is It Such a Big Deal? On the Cost of Journal Use in the Digital Era . . . . . . . . This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany, 10 Therefore, these Principles, supported by different institutions, are useful for detecting deviation from best practices in publishing. Therefore, approximately 4% of members responded to the questionnaire. Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Divison of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, 6 Epidemiology. The following analysis addressed the peer-review process. Before Solomon and Bjork (2012) analysed the APCs of 1,370 journals included in the Open-Access Directory in 2010 and found APCs ranging between 8 and 3,900 USD with an average APC of 904USD. With regard to solicited paper submissions by email campaigning, 142 (75.5%) participants had received 1150 email invitations to publish per month (n=60, 42.3%). However, this benefit comes with the cost of short- and long-term side effects that may negatively affect patients' quality of life (QoL) and However, identification of predatory journals and especially standardised approaches to classify predatory journals as such are only infrequently used and not well known, highlighting the need to provide more educational campaigns on the problems and challenges of predatory journals practices in the field of oncology. JCR-indexed MDPI-journals betray both traits through a steady increase in number of their published articles (sometimes to several hundred in just one regular issue) and special issues. Symptoms These actions will send out a clear message to researchers to refuse to publish in and to support predatory journals. MDPI founder and current president is Shu-Kun Lin, Ph.D (https://www.mdpi.com/about/team). 17.6% of the participants indicated to be willing to pay between 0 and 100 and 24% were willing to pay more than 1000 for publication in an open-access journal (table 3). This is an especially important aspect when the external appearance of the predatory journals, such as the OMICS journals, has reached such a level of sophistication that they totally or partially comply with the formal criteria that serve to differentiate between predatory and legitimate journals. Percentages have been calculated from all valid given answers. Dedicated educational initiatives are needed to raise awareness of this problem and to aid in the identification of predatory journals for the scientific oncology community. Did you publish any high impact publications in your field? In line with previous publications from the field of dermatology, participants working at an university hospital or actively publishing scientific literature were more likely to be familiar with the open access system and predatory journals.11 However, only the minority was aware of Bealls list indicating a lack in information on how to successfully identify journals with a predatory practice. However, this solution could only work in the medium to long term. https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing. A drug shortage is forcing doctors to reduce doses of chemotherapy. because it is used as a proxy for both quality and integrity. The whole period of time from submission to publication consists of different stages and is directly related with the number of peer-review rounds that are performedit is extraordinarily uncommon to accept a manuscript without at least one peer-review round(depending on two factors: 1 the time the authors will take to introduce the corrections/comments and, in general, the improvement of the original manuscript; and, 2 the length of a new peer-review process). Open Access free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions. 1; 397 journals were identified as potential predatory journals.After de-duplication and screening sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal For example, they no longer have webs with typographic errors, but with a much more sophisticated appearance, converting themselves into a non-evident/hidden predatory publisher, in view of their editorial behaviour. The results showed the average time from submission to first decision of JCR-indexed MDPI-journals was 19days, according to data provided in journals pages, section named Journal Statistics. These lists very soon become outdated and incomplete, especially if the resources to keep them updated are scarce. WebJournals. A review of the frequency of special issue publication in the control group was not conducted. The extent to which predatory journals can harm scientific practice increases as the numbers of such journals expand, in so far as they undermine scientific integrity, quality, and credibility, especially if those journals leak into prestigious databases. Cancers. It may therefore be appreciated that the reputation of MDPI Publisher has undergone ups and downs over the past few years and has both its critics and supporters, which makes it an interesting case study. Due to the breadth of MDPI journals assessed in this paper it was not possible to conduct in-depth work to compare each journal. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can WebOnly Open Access Journals Only SciELO Journals Only WoS Journals *, n (%) (n=169), Are you scientifically active at the moment?, n (%), Which arguments are the most important for you if considering a specific journal for publication of your scientific work?, yes, n (%), Which arguments would you include in the grading of the reliability of a specific scientific journal?, yes, n (%), Indexing of the journal (Pubmed, Web of Science, ), Cooperation with international organisations/societies, Publishing experiences of other colleagues, Further information on the peer-review process, Third party experience (eg, Blog entries/Google entries), Do you know the open-access system?, n (%), If yes, did you publish anything in an open-access journal yet? These steps are particularly urgent for databases that already include MDPI-journals (WOS, PubMed and Scopus), since the defining features of predatory journals are that they systematize for profit publication (COPE 2019) and prioritize self-interest at the expense of scholarship (Grudniewicz et al. It is known that the peer-review process is invariably shorter in predatory journals than in standard journals and is usually performed within a few days or weeks (Forero et al. With this in mind, talk with your doctor about what types of cancer screening may be appropriate for you. *, yes, n (%) (n=170), How many publications did you author as first or last author? 2018), MEDLINE, or Embase (Hayden 2020) with the appearance of legitimate scientific journals. Second, only limited insights are possible because not all the journals in the control group are in the framework of gold open access (which would allow a direct comparison). Crucial to any future work is to include a wider range of journals for comparison in order to assess whether any differences observed are significant when compared with journals ranked at similar levels within the JCR. and transmitted securely. Are you scientifically active at the moment? This investigation is centred on Clarivate's JCR, perhaps the most prestigious and best recognized database in academia with the widest use at a global level, in order to analyse the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). So, another aspect deserving further investigation are the impressive numbers of faculty staff on the Editorial Boards of MDPI-journals, above all if compared with the leading journals from each category. These facts suggest that MDPI has been open to question, a publisher that has been moving within a grey zone. CTARC | Cancer Treatment and Research Communications Finally, self-citation and intra-MDPI citation rates artificially increase the impact factors of JCR-indexed MDPI-journals that is quite clearly in breach of best practice and integrity in science. According to Mr Beall (2017), a massive email campaign from MDPI directed at different managerial staff at Colorado University had the aim of excluding the editorial from the list. It is interesting to note that the size of the Editorial Board was, in all cases, larger in the MDPI-journals than in the leading JCR-indexed journals belonging to the same categories (Table 2). (2019) and COPE (2019). 2019). Ninety-three potential predatory journals, 99 open access journals, and 100 subscription-based journals were included in the analysis. (n=169). The promotion of questionable special issues is one of the identifying characteristics of predatory journals (Alrawadieh 2020). A Cross-Sectional Comparison, Predatory Open Access: A Longitudinal Study of Article Volumes and Market Charateristics, Is It Such a Big Deal? The APC in JCR-indexed MDPI-journals (from 1000CHF to 2000 CHF) needs to be contextualized. Ethics approval: The study was reviewed and approved by the local Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Graz (ID: 29510 ex 16/17). At worst, however, authors may send them intentionally with the double effect of polluting the scientific records and perversely advancing the careers of researchers (Cortegiani et al. Both, self-citation and intra-MDPI citation rates directly affects the numerator in the journal impact-factor calculation, raising the journal impact value. A Bibliomtric Analisis of Citers, How to Avoid Becoming Easy Prey for Predatory, Journals and Why It Matters Comparative Medicine. cancer treatment Timeliness of diagnosis and treatment: the challenge of The present survey showed that a considerable fraction of oncologists might still not be aware of predatory practices of some publishers. the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health. (2017) have reminded us. All statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS V.25 (SPSS). The Swedish Childhood Tumor Biobank (BTB) is a nonprofit national infrastructure for collecting tissue samples and genomic data from pediatric patients diagnosed with central nervous system (CNS) and other solid tumors. Note: When a JCR-indexed journal is ranked in more than one category, 1 its highest rank is depicted in column Q; 2 the leading journal for comparison is the one with the highest impact factor (2018) in the category where the MDPI-journal is ranked. Bethesda, MD 20894, Web Policies The potential criteria for the identification of a predatory journal and a list of suspicious items are lengthy: journal names may be very similar to prestigious journals; the web page may contain spelling errors and questionable grammatical constructions and/or low quality images; the language on the journal webpage may resemble a hard sell that targets academic authors; the journal may include articles outside its stated scope or may have a very broad scope; submission can be by email instead of a manuscript management system; the editor-in-chief might also act as the editor-in-chief of another journal with a widely different scope, predominance of editorial board members from developing countries; time-lines for publication and fast-track peer-review processes might appear unrealistic; APCs can be low; impact-factor metrics may be unknown; spam emails may invite academics to submit papers; despite the open-access approach, transfer of copyright may be required; and, finally, non-professional or non-journal affiliated contact information may be given for the editorial office (Manca et al. Systemic therapies for GC, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, have evolved significantly in the past few years. Therefore, we aimed to explore the awareness of predatory journals among oncologists. Answers of all participants on the topic of open access publishing. Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment (TCRT) is a peer-reviewed, gold open access journal (featured in SCIE (Web of Science), PMC, and PubMed: MEDLINE) which focuses on the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of cancer. Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Article, Review, Research Letter, )?, n (%), If yes, how many invitations do you receive each month? Moreover, the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series, and Publishers downgraded MDPI to 0 in 2019 and later upgraded it to 1 again. In consequence, the scientific community recently initiated a discussion to increase the required prerequisites for a journal to be listed in PubMed.14 The results of the present survey highlight, that a broader education on how to identify predatory journals and proper resources and tools to facilitate this are urgently needed in the oncology scientific community, as there was no difference between the knowledge groups with regard to confrontation with scientific studies by patients.
Where To Find Ac Delco Parts,
Isoacoustics Orea Indigo,
Ashfall Legacy Series,
Articles J