DOCX Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida - Home Input parameters, basis sets and coordinates of the input and output structures must be reported. Any pending input will be lost. The page will refresh upon submission. 31010402000380, , editor@medsci.cn. Figures should not contain more than one panel unless the parts are logically connected; each panel of a multipart figure should be sized so that the whole figure can be reduced by the same amount and reproduced at the smallest size at which essential details are visible. Peer review times vary per journal. The corresponding author should indicate whether the work described in the manuscript has been discussed with a specific Editor at npj Vaccines before submission. Just want to know what you think based on your experience. I do understand that you cannot have exact answer. In either case, the revised manuscript should be accompanied by a cover letter explaining how the manuscript has been changed, and a separate point-by-point response to referees' comments. The Editor contacts the author with the decision. About the editorial process: As there are many steps involved in the editorial process, this may in some cases take longer then you had anticipated. Author KL has previously acted as a paid consultant for [company name B] but declares no non-financial competing interests. Each complete figure must be supplied as a separate file upload. The npj Series journals are committed to publishing the highest-quality research. There are several factors that influence the time taken for review, most notably availability of article referees. When your paper has been accepted you will be sent an email giving you access to 'Author Services', an online portal which will enable you to track your paper and access additional services. The journals operate under a collaborative editorial model, with active researchers engaged as manuscript-handling Editors, supported by in-house, PhD-trained Nature Portfolio managing Editors. If the authors ask the Editors to consider the previous reviews, they should include a note explaining the relationship between the submitted manuscript and the previous submission and (assuming it has been revised in light of the referees' criticisms) give a point-by-point response to the referees. What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? 0, 80 Authors are encouraged to consider the needs of colourblind readers (a substantial minority of the male population) when choosing colours for figures. Journal names are italicized and abbreviated (with full stops) according to common usage. 3Nature CommunicationsTips - Safety hazards posed by reagents or protocols should be identified clearly. [CDATA[// >process - Geological Society of America Published conference abstracts, numbered patents and research datasets may be included in the reference list. Serum Response . If you are willing to add data to the paper to address the shortcomings, explain what this data is and what it shows. The following types of contribution to npj Series journals are peer-reviewed: Articles, Brief Communications, Case Report, Comment, Matters Arising, Meeting Report, Perspective, Protocol, Resource, Reviews. Authors must provide adequate data to support their assignment of identity, purity and homogeneity for compounds and materials described in the manuscript. There is a waiver policy for these charges. Asked by Narmin Mammad If the authors have successfully addressed all the comments of the Reviewers and the Editors, the Editors will deem the paper acceptable for publication in npj Vaccines. Editorial Manager displays status terms as described in the table below. NPJ PARKINSONS DIS . Submission guidelines | npj Precision Oncology Recoloring primary data, such as fluorescence or rainbow pseudo-coloured images, to colour-safe combinations such as green and magenta, turquoise and red, yellow and blue or other accessible colour palettes is strongly encouraged. ), direct structural analysis by NMR spectroscopic methods may not be possible. Finally, editors need to assess these reviews and formulate a decision. How to write an appeal letter | Springer Nature Protocols and Methods When creating and submitting digital files, please follow the guidelines below. The corresponding author is sent proofs and is welcome to discuss changes with the Editors, but npj Precision Oncology reserves the right to make the final decision about matters of style and the size of figures. Your new or revised submission has been sent back by the Editorial Team for changes prior to review. The corresponding author is notified by e-mail when the Editor decides to send a paper for review. For all studies using custom code that is deemed central to the conclusions, a statement must be included in the Methods section, under the heading "Code availability", indicating whether and how the code can be accessed, including any restrictions. Descriptions of standard protocols and experimental procedures should be given. 0, 89 2002 tips. To obtain x-mol.com At publication, Nature Portfolio journals consider it best practice to release custom computer code in a way that allows readers to repeat the published results. | Please visit our contact page. Suitably high resolution figures may be inserted within the text at appropriate positions or grouped at the end. The Reviewer identities and their full reports willbe transferred, and although the journal Editors will take the previous reviews into account when making their decision, the Editors will likely choose to take advice from additional or alternative referees. Authors are encouraged to seek copy editing or language editing services for their manuscripts, either before submission or at the revision stage, should they feel it would benefit their manuscript. Please do not submit revisions as new manuscripts. Especially the status 'Under review' encompasses many steps; while it may appear your manuscript is not progressing through the editorial process, a lot of activities may be happening during this part of the review process. Many colourblind readers cannot interpret visuals that rely on discrimination of green and red, for example. Nature CommunicationsTips: NCOnline: 140250268 . DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2016.04.001generalspecialized, Science Nature Science Nature general science, JACS Angewandte Chemiegeneral chemistryspecializedAnalytical Chemistry, UCSDGuy BertrandGuyACS Award in Inorganic Chemistry (2014)GuyInorganic Chemistry Dalton Transactions Chemistry-An Asian JournalGuyDalton TransactionsChemistry-An Asian Journal general interestsChemical Communications Organic Letters Chemical Communications Organic Letters OL, Chem X-MOLGuy9Science Science, Science wordGuycover letterJACS Angewandte Chemie cover letterunder evaluationto advisoradvisorgeneralAAASemail2advisorchemistrygeneral science, Science GuyNatureNature ChemistryNature wordNature Guy, Nature manuscript receivededitor assignedmanuscript under considerationFigure 1GuyNature emailNature general scienceNature Nature Chemistry Nature Chemistrypeer reviewGuyDavidNature Chemistry is not bad., 50decision sent to authorwaiting for revisionFigure 2DavidUCSDfacetime50f**king awesomeGuyemailDavidimessageGuy, 1Guy, 3, Guy1Guy80201email1, GuyDavidNature Chemistry DavidBlack FridayGuyInorganic Chemistry1waiting for revision, Cell PressChem158Cell PressDr. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. SCIWaiting to Send Decision to Author, @12:21ManuscptReviseandRe-Review, @5:, , @13:ManuscptReviseandRe-Review, @16:, Geotechnical Engineeng With Assessor, SCIreviewNot Assigned, SCIreviewers assigend, , Eupean Polymer Journal with editor, sciunder review reviews invited, worduse 2007 or later version, mateals letters 3Required Reviews Completed.